Here's how I've always kind of liked to think of it, and I think this is what kind of addresses that GE issue. I'm not saying it's inherently scored this way, or that that's what adjudicators are thinking, but I like to think that UIL finds the best band, and BOA finds the best show... Now, before I finish, I realize a lot of time this could be the same group... I just feel like the quality of the performance and not just elements of the performance itself is what makes UIL different, you're getting credit for nothing unless it's done well. Another way to think of it is if every band marched the same show I feel like the best band to match the same show would be the UIL champ, whereas the BOA champ ( and by no means am I saying it isn't deserved ) may be the best overall performance. I hope that makes as much sense to others as it does to me. It also doesn't mean having a more difficult show can't help, as I feel if you nail the music and visual you will be rewarded for it. I don't even necessarily have a preference and I see the merits of both and respect both scoring systems. You must be clean to win a state title though. If your GE is off the charts you don't have to be absolutely pristine to take down a regional. To serve as an example Marcus just doesn't give me that total wow factor where I just want to get to my feet at the end but I have no doubt that if they wanted to they could, case in point all there state championships. CTJ did have the best GE presentation last year I feel, Leander right there though (Leander homer here), but I didn't think they were particularly clean, but it was also a very demanding show. BOA is more forgiving whereas UIL is like play well, March well but your show in of itself I don't feel is overly important. A BOA winning show is never boring, a UIL can be. Both deserved though in their own right.