clarineticorn Posted January 23, 2011 Posted January 23, 2011 Personally I'm a high-cam kind of girl. I like to see all the sets. Multi-cam is nice though, because you end up getting more of a feel for the band's personality and you connect better with them. Which do you prefer and why? Friendly debate, ladies. No slitting of throats over something as trivial as this. Quote
Xenon Posted January 23, 2011 Posted January 23, 2011 I used to be strictly in the High-Cam camp, but shows like The Remaining and Spartacus require detailed closeups. Quote
takigan Posted January 24, 2011 Posted January 24, 2011 I'm with Daniel. For most pre-2001 stuff (the Westfields, the Duncanvilles, the Springs) I prefer Hi-Cam since those shows back then were more music centric and the real visual meat came from the intricate forms and spread-out 50+ member Mega Guards wielding bellowing flags, rather than individual body visuals. Nowadays, though, the multi-cam is almost necessary to be able to fully appreciate the show. It's fitting and mighty convenient how the era of DVDs (and their ability to include both vantage points in one product) came about at the same time visual books started to add more micromanaged detail (head tilts, limb-based visuals etc.). I'd hate to watch Tarpon Springs (FL) 2010 in Hi-Cam. Quote
Danpod Posted January 25, 2011 Posted January 25, 2011 The shows of today almost require a multi-cam view. To the casual fan, Lawrence Central might look like any other program from a high-cam view. However, a closer look really shows off how ridiculously detailed and clean their visuals are. The only show that cameras cannot do justice for is Through A Glass, Darkly. It has to be seen live. Quote
How_Will_It_End? Posted January 25, 2011 Posted January 25, 2011 Ultimately, I'd like to have both...but if I had to choose between one or the other-Multi-Cam by a mile. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.