Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hebron had a 97.85 in semis. That is the highest score in BOA history on any level. It beats 2007 LD Bell's semis pre-penalty 97.80 and 2008 Avon's Finals 97.75.

 

And they got that 97.85 with a low 17.7 in individual visual. Incredible.

Posted

Here's something else for you, out of the twelve music judges (four in prelims, four in semis, four in finals), one judge had Hebron in second. ELEVEN OUT OF TWELVE had them in first. That is absolutely insane. This includes a 19.9 and a few 19.8s. And that second place was just .1 behind Avon. Andy Sealy has officially created one of the best music schools in the country. I'm so pumped for state next year, Marcus and Hebron battling for either a 1st state title, or a 7th straight title. Here we go.

Posted
  On 11/15/2015 at 7:24 PM, SnareSnare13 said:

Here's something else for you, out of the twelve music judges (four in prelims, four in semis, four in finals), one judge had Hebron in second. ELEVEN OUT OF TWELVE had them in first. That is absolutely insane. This includes a 19.9 and a few 19.8s. And that second place was just .1 behind Avon. Andy Sealy has officially created one of the best music schools in the country. I'm so pumped for state next year, Marcus and Hebron battling for either a 1st state title, or a 7th straight title. Here we go.

Don't forget Flower Mound in that equation.  While they haven't been been considered the same level musically as the other two, they have taken the music caption over them a few times this year.

Posted

Anyone else feel like Hebron's preformance time in finals also kept them from winning in finals? I mean I know it's a new set of judges and all but how do you drop 1.6 points in 4-5 hours? I had the privilege of witnessing both semis and finals performances from the stands and Hebron's finals run seemed so much cleaner visually and musically they were just flawless. BA really stepped it up in finals but I wasn't expecting the gap between them to be over a whole point! The preformance time must have played a factor in Hebron's low visual score which is what cost them the Eagle.

Posted

I agree in that the scores would've been closer had Hebron performed right after Broken Arrow, but I think it's a stretch to think the same panel of judges would've bumped them 1.3 points to win from performance order alone. Music scores would've probably opened like principalagent said, visual scores maybe made a big tighter, but I think the best they could've hoped for is beating Avon - or at least gotten really really close. It also didn't help that some of the same judges that judged prelims ended up judging finals IN THE SAME CAPTION (i.e. the visual GE judge who basically sealed Hebron's fate). Why not shift them around like at regular regionals? 

Posted
  On 11/17/2015 at 3:46 AM, HerroWon said:

Anyone else feel like Hebron's preformance time in finals also kept them from winning in finals? I mean I know it's a new set of judges and all but how do you drop 1.6 points in 4-5 hours? I had the privilege of witnessing both semis and finals performances from the stands and Hebron's finals run seemed so much cleaner visually and musically they were just flawless. BA really stepped it up in finals but I wasn't expecting the gap between them to be over a whole point! The preformance time must have played a factor in Hebron's low visual score which is what cost them the Eagle.

 

Obviously I have no real clue what I'm talking about because I wasn't in the judges' heads that night, but I think this is definitely the case. I do agree that Hebron was behind visually, but I also think they were pretty far ahead in music.

 

Here's what I think happens if the top band of any captions goes first: the judges acknowledge the band's superiority by placing them first, but then the judges may lose an idea of how much better the top band was, so they don't reward that band with as much of a marginal lead as they maybe should. While the design of Avon and Broken Arrow are pretty good, I still think that Hebron was very far ahead of them in terms of execution and besides the fact that Hebron's show is also a pretty effective musical book, their playing (OMG) added so much effect. I remember listening and thinking, "holy ****, that technicality + precision + emotion" re: the woodwind runs in Pegasus, or the emotion in the ballad, ok or any other part of their impressive show. I never got the same feeling from BA or Avon music. Their performances were very good, don't get me wrong.

 

Then you see Hebron's visual scores and it definitely look like they were just forgotten. For example the scoring difference between them and the other top bands in terms of VPI was a bit excessive, imo. Then that difference in VGE was devastating. I know nothing about VGE, but I cringed when I was the variation in scores. I thought it was pretty arbitrary. 

  • 1 month later...
Posted

While I must give credit where credit is due, everyone's scores in semi-finals shot up. The score inflation in semi-finals was ridiculous. Yes it is great that they posted the highest score ever, but if there were a lot of other bands that had previously beaten hebron up there in that environment, it could've been a different story. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...