Lustra.exe Posted April 11, 2006 Posted April 11, 2006 The variety is in style, not in tempo. but im still all for a slow movement. Quote
FunkyFlute07 Posted May 30, 2006 Posted May 30, 2006 so yeah, last year our show had some type of jazz upbeat thing instead of a slow song and i greatly missed that slow one. gosh. it was just dumb. but some shows are good without it...and some aren't any better with it. so yes. but i like a slow movement. Quote
Fortisimo Posted July 3, 2006 Posted July 3, 2006 Hmmm, does a show need a slow movement... I guess we will find out soon enough, lol. Quote
x04ty29er Posted July 7, 2006 Posted July 7, 2006 I believe that a show does not physically need a slow movement but rather a sound which people would percieve as a slow sound. Quote
Fortisimo Posted July 24, 2006 Posted July 24, 2006 So you're saying we need to cool down the air in the stadium.... a helluva lot? "Man that's some slow sound!" Quote
trumpetman1288 Posted July 24, 2006 Posted July 24, 2006 Ha ha..nice. I personally am a fan of fast, intense shows, but I do believe that a ballad is a nice contrast to constant loudness. If the ballad doesn't fit the show, however, it really has no place in it. I mean..a people usually perceive ballads to be softer, but the climax of a ballad usually is what most people would call a "blow section." It's the moment in the ballad that just grabs you and makes you think "oh man, this band can play!" But yeah...slow movement only if it fits the show. Quote
Trumpet 2009 Posted November 7, 2007 Posted November 7, 2007 Although a slow movement is nice as a breather, I don't think that a show would need one. However, it shows the judges that you are capable of playing softly, and adds contrast between fast and slow. It also depends on the show: if you have an empire theme such as The Rise and Fall of Rome, a slow movement might show how the empire, once established, is a beautiful and peaceful machine of bureaucracy. Quote
crazyjakeup Posted November 7, 2007 Posted November 7, 2007 (texas) marching music, like any other kind of music(sonota, concerto etc.) has form... the ballad mvt is a big part of marching music. only the best bands pull off great "slow mvts". the music may be slow but you can still make it exciting by marching double time to add effect... Quote
french_horn_finatic Posted November 8, 2007 Posted November 8, 2007 its a good change in pace... plus it sounds AY-MAY-ZINGGG in a dome! Quote
radchad Posted November 13, 2007 Posted November 13, 2007 Fortisimo said: Lmao, does anyone actually march at over 200 BPM? We had a part that was 210 my Senior year. Quote
king_kool360 Posted November 13, 2007 Posted November 13, 2007 Not every show needs one! What if you were do a MMPR theme? The original Power Rangers were to "bamf" to do slow things. Quote
MthsTrumpetsDOItBetter Posted November 21, 2007 Posted November 21, 2007 I think that a marching show does not NEED a slow movement but it sounds beter with a slow movement in it. It gives the listener a chance to just breathe. I also feel like the slow movements are a good time to showcase the woodwinds and the soloists. Although the shows do not NEED a slow movement, most of the time the show sounds better with a slow movement [in my oppinion] Quote
dtxtrmpt Posted November 21, 2007 Posted November 21, 2007 my $.02... a show doesnt NEED a slow movement. variation of tempos, if done correctly, can add alot to a show, but it isnt neccesary to have a good show. Alot of shows would be better without their ballad. The ballad only helps if its done correctly, and many bands look at the ballad as the breather, the break, etc. but truth is, it is probably the hardest part of your show. It deserves alot more attention than it gets. A ballad done well shows the maturity of a band, not only can the band play loud and march fast, but they can make music. The ballad is normally my favorite part of shows. Quote
Anthony V Posted July 11, 2010 Posted July 11, 2010 There are a large number of factors that play into the usage of a ballad during a show, but one of the most prominent has to do with effect. There are basically two ways you can relay effect: -Contrast -Conformity You can contrast different elements of the show (whatever they might be) to elaborate on specific identity, or you can compare two or more like elements (again, whatever they might be) to create a sense of uniformity and a powerful presence. A ballad is generally a contrast to the rest of the show - a great source of music GE if used correctly; Among other things, it usually takes the focus off just the band (seeing how the slower music might be more ambient than thematic) and places it upon a contrasting element that amplifies the effect. In other words, it gives the band a break from melting your face, and gives someone (or something) else a chance in the spotlight for a while. While I don't see a ballad as absolutely crucial to having a good show, I do see it necessary for more flexibility of the performers and a display of the [hopefully] broad talent range being presented. (i.e, I can play "Gems of Adiemus" and then turn around and play something like "O Magnum Mysterium") Quote
socaldrills Posted July 11, 2010 Posted July 11, 2010 Hi! TXBands.com! I don't think shows need slow movemints! I sea bands in SoCal no slow movement all time! Quote
EODrillDesigner98 Posted August 2, 2010 Posted August 2, 2010 socaldrills said: Hi! TXBands.com! I don't think shows need slow movemints! I sea bands in SoCal no slow movement all time! I have to agree with socaldrills about most bands in socal not having slow movement at all. Quote
K3v1n Posted September 2, 2010 Posted September 2, 2010 I don't think that it is necessary but it certainly helps to have a slower or more melodic piece than the typical drill-play-hold-scream-drill-hit-play-drill-technique-play-drill-halt aspect of the band. I have seen a few shows with 6 minutes of opener-type music then a small emphasis on some quieter, or slower piece, but I don't recall seeing one completely without a "ballad". Quote
RedJoker25 Posted November 13, 2010 Posted November 13, 2010 (edited) From what I've read, most people are tackling this question from a judge/spectator view. As a performer whose director generally chooses fast paced shows, a full slow movement is basically the only chance for me (a slightly not-athletically-inclined person) to recover. This year, our show's second/fifth movements were supposed to be at least 178 with very few holds (part five had one 8 count and one 4 count hold). If it weren't for the slow/hold-intensive 3rd movement and the relatively slow (124) 4th movement, movement 5 would have been much worse than it was. On the other hand, last year's show wasn't quite as fast, but kept up the pace the entire time. Never felt I needed a break, and the show flowed pretty well. What I'm getting at is the question can't be answered from a general standpoint. Some shows need a slow movement so that the performers don't tire out. Some shows probably don't need it because it just wouldn't fit the theme. Some really intense shows have stronger marchers so they don't need it. To really answer this question, you have to look at the individual show, the band/corps, and what they're trying to do. Edited November 13, 2010 by RedJoker25 Quote
bluebellbrass07 Posted November 13, 2010 Posted November 13, 2010 For what its worth... Cadets 07 had no ballad, and that show was AWESOME Quote
BassBonesTX Posted October 29, 2011 Posted October 29, 2011 I think a band needs a ballad or something to that extent. Something to get away from in your face playing. It doesn't have to be slow necessarily (I've marched shows that march about 150 in "slow" movements). Quote
red oakian Posted October 30, 2011 Posted October 30, 2011 Slow movements, or ballads, Give a little bit of contrast in the show so it's not the same thing over and over again. They are also a way to show off your bands marching fundamentals Quote
Cookie_MonsterSR Posted November 2, 2011 Posted November 2, 2011 No but you do need slower sections if for no reason other than to give the kids a chance to breathe. It also gets boring if its just fast and loud the whole show. Quote
marcomac29 Posted November 4, 2011 Posted November 4, 2011 it adds contrast which gives greater impact moments when you play louder. it also gives you a chance to show the judges and the audience how beautiful you can play instead of just in their face stuff. it's a chance to be musical, not a chance to be boring. Quote
herpaderp Posted November 4, 2012 Posted November 4, 2012 Very late here, but I'd say that above all, keep in mind that slow movements are HARD. Sure, they're easier in terms of technicality and energy, but they expose marching fundamentals a lot. Most of all, you have to really engage musically to make them compelling. So be wise - know if your group can pull off slower, quieter music. A boring slow movement drags you down, but if you really nail an emotional ballad, you can put yourself above and beyond the competition. I have always thought that it's the slower stuff and keeping dynamics and balance great in all tempos that shows real ensemble musicianship. Fast, flashy loud stuff is just silly and obnoxious when that's all you can do. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.